|
Get the flash player here: http://www.adobe.com/flashplayer
Ohio-ACC members participated in the Ohio-ACC Legislative Day on April 27, 2010. We discussed
the following: ISSUE #1: Tobacco
Smoking
is a leading cause of heart and vascular disease, major lung diseases, and other common forms of cancer. Nearly one-fifth
of deaths from cardiovascular disease are attributable to smoking. In Ohio, tobacco use is the
number one cause of preventable death in our state, killing more than 18,000 Ohioans each year. Another
18,000 Ohio kids become regular, daily smokers; one-third of them will die prematurely as a result. This is not a coincidence;
tobacco companies spend $1.5 million every day in Ohio, which is also used as a testing ground for new tobacco
products, many intended for and marketed towards potential younger users. It’s time
for us to do something. Studies show that
increasing the cigarette tax and taxing non-cigarette forms of tobacco at the same rate as cigarettes are highly effective
ways to reduce the use of these dangerous products, increase revenue for our state, and, most importantly, save lives and
money. And your constituents support this; a recent poll showed that 63.5% of Ohioans supported increasing the cigarette tax,
and 74.9% of Ohioans support taxing all products at the same rate.
ISSUE
#2: Physician Profiling
The issue of physician ranking has been hotly debated for several years. Insurers
have supported obtaining data in order to tier and quantify cost effective care, while consumers have wanted data to compare
doctors based on quality and cost. OH-ACC supports H.B. 122 and S.B. 98, which seek to address the issue of physician ratings
by insurance companies in Ohio. This legislation would:
o
Rank physicians based on quality or
quality and cost, and clearly identify the degree to which rankings are based on cost;
o Utilize nationally recognized, AMA-approved quality standards;
o
Use valid sample sizes, appropriate
risk adjustment, and accurate physician attribution methodologies;
o Note the limitations of physician profiling programs and provide a process for patients
to register complaints about the system;
o Provide
physicians with information about the way rankings are designed and a process to appeal; and
o Utilize an independent ratings examiner with expertise in efficiency
measurement to oversee compliance.
ISSUE
#3: Medical Liability Reform
From 2001 to 2005,
Ohio was designated a medical liability “crisis” state and physicians’ medical liability premiums increased
on average 105 percent during that time period. Since then, the legislature has wisely enacted nearly two dozen reforms, including
a $350,000 cap on non-economic damages and a statute of repose and limitations on claims. As a result, Ohio has experienced
a 22 percent decline in medical liability premiums and a 40 percent reduction in the number of lawsuits filed against doctors.
OH-ACC greatly appreciates our successful medical liability laws, and strongly opposes any effort to overturn or weaken them.
|
